[【T00ls公告】] T00ls更换新服务器，采用Docker架构

别怕，百毒不侵。

ping www.t00ls.net
Pinging 108.sp.spcdntip.com [101.69.121.35] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 101.69.121.35: bytes=32 time=38ms TTL=51
Reply from 101.69.121.35: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=51
Reply from 101.69.121.35: bytes=32 time=35ms TTL=51
Reply from 101.69.121.35: bytes=32 time=36ms TTL=51

Ping statistics for 101.69.121.35:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 38ms, Average = 36ms

-----香港 pccw

访问速度快了不少

正在 Ping www.t00ls.net [222.186.129.102] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=9ms TTL=49
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=9ms TTL=49
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=9ms TTL=49
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=9ms TTL=49

222.186.129.102 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 9ms，最长 = 9ms，平均 = 9ms

PING www.t00ls.net (222.186.129.102): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 222.186.129.102: icmp_seq=0 ttl=48 time=14.744 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.102: icmp_seq=1 ttl=48 time=28.048 ms
^C
--- www.t00ls.net ping statistics ---
2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 14.744/21.396/28.048/6.652 ms

正在 Ping 108.sp.spcdntip.com [58.205.220.35] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 58.205.220.35 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=51
来自 58.205.220.35 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=51
来自 58.205.220.35 的回复: 字节=32 时间=38ms TTL=51
来自 58.205.220.35 的回复: 字节=32 时间=41ms TTL=51

C:\Users\wy>ping www.t00ls.net

正在 Ping www.t00ls.net [222.186.129.102] 具有 32 字节的数据:
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=31ms TTL=52
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=32ms TTL=52
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=31ms TTL=52
来自 222.186.129.102 的回复: 字节=32 时间=30ms TTL=52

222.186.129.102 的 Ping 统计信息:
    数据包: 已发送 = 4，已接收 = 4，丢失 = 0 (0% 丢失)，
往返行程的估计时间(以毫秒为单位):
    最短 = 30ms，最长 = 32ms，平均 = 31ms

Microsoft Windows [版本 5.2.3790]
(C) 版权所有 1985-2003 Microsoft Corp.

C:\WINDOWS\system32>ping www.t00ls.net


Pinging 108.sp.spcdntip.com [121.29.54.100] with 32 bytes of data:



Reply from 121.29.54.100: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52

Reply from 121.29.54.100: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52

Reply from 121.29.54.100: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52

Reply from 121.29.54.100: bytes=32 time=37ms TTL=52



Ping statistics for 121.29.54.100:

    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),

Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:

    Minimum = 37ms, Maximum = 37ms, Average = 37ms

来自香港 118.193.241.11

ping t00ls.net
PING t00ls.net (222.186.129.90): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=0 ttl=50 time=35.871 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=1 ttl=50 time=38.178 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=2 ttl=50 time=34.263 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=3 ttl=50 time=36.140 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=4 ttl=50 time=65.529 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=5 ttl=50 time=34.376 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=6 ttl=50 time=72.242 ms
Request timeout for icmp_seq 7
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=8 ttl=50 time=34.491 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=9 ttl=50 time=35.863 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=10 ttl=50 time=34.276 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=11 ttl=50 time=33.805 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=12 ttl=50 time=34.045 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=13 ttl=50 time=37.093 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=14 ttl=50 time=35.573 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=15 ttl=50 time=33.996 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=16 ttl=50 time=33.818 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=17 ttl=50 time=35.877 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=18 ttl=50 time=36.872 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=19 ttl=50 time=51.368 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=20 ttl=50 time=41.209 ms
64 bytes from 222.186.129.90: icmp_seq=21 ttl=50 time=36.990 ms
^C
--- t00ls.net ping statistics ---
22 packets transmitted, 21 packets received, 4.5% packet loss
round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 33.805/39.613/72.242/10.261 ms

我网通的网测试丢包了。。。